Details. To date my very early film work was 400H as I got some free with my Contax 645 (now sold). Kodak Portra 400 and Fuji Pro 400H are great colour negative 400 iso films. I do prefer Portra 400 to Portra 160 usually. Posted on August 27, 2016 August 27, 2016 by Laura Daly. Jeder Fotograf hat scheinbar seinen Liebling und ich bin oft von den Portraitaufnahmen, die beide Filme produzieren absolut begeistert. Even in the large version the very fine detail won’t be visible but we thought it was useful to give you a general feel for the changes at different exposures for each film stock: Yesterday I added my Kodak Portra 400 v2 film simulation recipe to the Fuji X Weekly blog.That was a Patron-only early-access recipe on the Fuji X Weekly app, but now it’s available to everyone!I think a lot of people will really appreciate that Portra 400 v2 recipe. For years, professional photographers have preferred KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA Films because of their consistently smooth, natural reproduction of the full range of skin tones. In measurable metrics like sales, and less measurable ones like prestige, Portra 400 has been the unchallenged big cheese for years. You’ll find most photographers lean either as Kodak shooters or Fuji Shooters,” writes Flynn. “Fujifilm Pro 400H and Kodak Portra 400 are two of the most popular color, professional films available today. I can’t tell you which one is better for you, but I can tell you for me, I like the new recipe better, yet I see that the original version has its place and shouldn’t be discarded. It's like they read the future! For 35mm film I use Kodak Portra 160 and for medium format film normally Kodak Portra 400 and more recently Fuji Pro 400H again. Dieser Artikel: Fuji Pro 400 H 120-5 Farbnegativ-Filme 69,00 €. In terms of grain Portra 400 is significantly finer than 400H I've found. “Fujifilm Pro 400H and Kodak Portra 400 are two of the most popular color, professional films available today. Pro 400 H Graubalance Lieferumfang: Fuji er eine gleichmäßige von ISO 400 natürlichen Hauttonwiedergabe und. ISO 400/27° 9 Kamera, smoky. For those who’ve ever wished to match these two side-by-side on the identical scenes with out going out and capturing them […] Dabei spart man sich den Gang in die … All 135. With that being said, today I’ll be going over Fujifilm Pro 400H – some of the pros and cons, and I’ll show some examples so you can judge the film stock for yourself. The lake is very clear. Fuji 400H is most known for it’s stunning soft and pastel look when it is overexposed. Pro 400H was Fuji’s alternative to Kodak’s Portra 400, but it’s going too far to call them equals. Fuji Pro 400. Archenemies: Kodak Portra 400 Versus Fuji Pro 400H | Fstoppers Something that we at Film Supply Clubtypically preach is that the choices you make are preference Ponderosa State Park sits on a peninsula on Payette Lake in the middle of Idaho. I never had much of a problem with 160S, really liked it. Every roll I’ve ever shot has been metered at 400 o… An optical 8x10 from 6x7cm Pro 400H, and Portra 400.. the 400H looked like it was from 35mm. In terms of grain Portra 400 is significantly finer than 400H I've found. For the last few weeks I have been experimenting with colour film. Portra 400 has never failed me. Which one is the better Kodak Portra 400 recipe? I haven't tried the new Portra 400 yet. New photos to follow once … Goloby: I cannot belive nobody started this yet. … An optical 8x10 from 6x7cm Pro 400H, and Portra 400.. the 400H looked like it was from 35mm. Versandt und verkauft von Amazon. Still finishing a batch of Portra 400 VC and NC I have on my fridge. Portra 400 Album. The Find Lab made a blog post back in 2016 about making Kodak Portra 400 look like Fuji PRO 400H. 35mm Kodak Portra 160 is much cheaper than 135 Fuji Pro 400 and sadly Fuji Pro 160NS is only … It produces vivid colors with a soft contrast, and, compared to a film like Kodak Portra 400, it has a cooler toned appearance. Our curiosity was peaked when we heard word of this new film, just after Fuji began to faze out 400h (our preferred emulsion) in med format. That said, I continue to try shooting Fuji Pro 400H. It looks like it has more latitude than the Fuji. I think that what I dislike most about Pro 400H is the color palette. Portra 400 has never failed me. But is is more NC or more VC? Since then I have shot almost all Kodak Portra film so recently bought a new box of 120 400H to see how I liked it now. Bila selama ini Kodak Portra 400 mendulang kesuksesan dan menjadi salah satu brand roll film paling terkenal dan paling banyak dicari, Fuji PRO 400H juga menjadi salah satu favorit yang banyak digunakan fotografer profesional karena penerjemahan warna yang sangat akurat untuk jenis foto fashion dan portrait. Lieferumfang:1x 5er. Our lab can make them look similar to save you a few extra bucks. Nur noch 15 auf Lager. I could never go back to 400H. Because Portra 400 has a yellow base and because Noritsu primarily works in the magenta and green channel, so there is less yellow in the scans. 9 auf die m – 2.7 Hier stellst du und erzielst so. Reply Simon King says: Kostenlose Lieferung. Kodak Portra 400. Vierfarbiger Schichteffekt Negativfarbfilm. For two films that are often compared to one another, how do they compare? Color Negative 120. The first rolls I picked up were the muted, pastel options from Kodak and Fujifilm. As I was exploring, it felt like Ponderosa could be a National Park and not a State Park. All three will cost you between $6 and $8 per roll of 16 exposures—$19 for a 3-pack of Lomography 400, $35 for a 5-pack of Kodak Portra 400, and $40 for a 5-pack of Fujicolor Pro 400H. The difference between Fuji Superia and Kodak Ultramax is … Kodak Portra 400 and Fujifilm Pro 400H. Pack Filme Portra. I could never go back to 400H. Kodak Portra 160 Color Negative 120 Film (5-er Pack) 49,83 €. In my personal experience, I strongly prefer Kodak’s Portra 400, as you may know from my recent review of it. In this video i tested the two commons and most famous film rolls: Kodak Portra 400 and the Fuji Pro 400H. We have been tapping into Kodak's Vision technology in 35mm motion picture film for over the past year, but couldn't figure out a good way to translate it into our medium format world. I never had much of a problem with 160S, really liked it. Both are alive and kicking and franckly you cannot go wrong any one you chose. It’s a high-speed, daylight-balanced color film stock with fine grain. The new Portra 400 recipe is a little more accurate to the film, in my opinion. Of course, with film, depending on how it’s shot, developed, printed or scanned, results can vary greatly. While I think the new version is more accurate, that’s not to say that the original version isn’t accurate. Braedon Flynn and the oldsters at Film Supply Club have put collectively a “shootout” between two of the most well-liked shade unfavorable movie shares on the market: Fujifilm Pro 400H and Kodak Portra 400. Because of the increased latitude of Portra 400, we’ve received many requests to scan and edit Portra 400 to look like Fuji 400H. 5 rolls of Kodak Portra 400 in 35mm At true ISO 400 speed, this film delivers spectacular skin tones plus exceptional color saturation over a wide range of lighting conditions. Pro 400H is just the latest of their films to be discontinued (though it’s worth noting that they have brought back Acros.) While they are the only company to offer a range of slide film, Fuji’s offerings pale in comparison to those from Kodak. I loaded the camera with my Fujicolor Pro 400H film simulation recipe and headed down the trail through the tall trees. In a notice posted on the Pro 400H product page, Fujifilm says the ‘unique’ film is being discontinued due to issues with ‘procur[ing] the raw materials needed to produce Pro 400H film.’ It reads, in part: Kodak Portra 400 Color Negative 120 Film (5-er Pack) 55,60 €. I've done quite a bit of underexposure with Portra but I've only shot 400H at box speed. I liked the idea and thought it would be a fun challenge, so I agreed. Fuji 400H: Portra 160: Portra 400: Portra 800: And for the grand finale, ultra film geek experience…we shot a few other exposures too, ranging from 3 under to 4 over, for Fuji 400H, Portra 160, Portra 400 and Portra 800. I cannot make up my mind which one I prefer Pro 400H Portra 400 3 x Fuji Pro . Home Film Photography 1 Comment If you shoot film, you probably lean towards Portra or Pro 400H. In their blog post they are talking about pretty much the same technical details that Stephen Wood mentioned. While there are some minor objective differences that might make you choose one or the other—e.g. Fuji Pro 400H 120 film is easier to seal when you’re done—generally speaking, the video is trying to show you the results so you can compare the “look” of the two films and pick the right one when you go out shooting. Pack Filme Portra. Kodak Portra 400. These film stocks may well be two of the most compared in the film world. Versandt und verkauft von foto24. I do prefer Portra 400 to Portra 160 usually. To some, that’s enough to pass it over in favor of something with the word “Professional” in the name. Fujifilm Pro 400. Fuji X Weekly reader Luis Costa asked me if I could create a Kodak Portra 400 film simulation recipe for the Fujifilm X100F. Fujifilm has announced it is discontinuing production of its Pro 400H color negative film in both 35mm and 120 formats. Through the years and attempts of shooting this film, I’ve started to wonder if in fact I’m just not shooting the film the way that it was designed. “Fujifilm Pro 400H and Kodak Portra 400 are two of the most popular color, professional films available today. For reference, Kodak Portra 400 is exposure tested here and Fuji Pro 400H is exposure tested here. Negativfilm (36-Aufnahmen, 2-er. While Fuji 400h does, indeed, have a cooler rendition than Kodak Portra 400, it is capable of much more accurate color rendition than what is shown here. Wenn man den aktuellen Trend der pastellenen Portraitaufnahmen beobachtet, laufen sich Fuji Pro 400H und Kodak Portra 400 – die Königsfilme in dieser Sparte – regelmäßig den Rang ab. Because of this, we want to let you in on a little secret! You’ll find most photographers lean either as Kodak shooters or Fuji Shooters,” writes Flynn. I was doing my usual reading and found this fantastic website with a side by side comparison of Kodak Portra 160 / 400 / 800 and Fuji Pro 400H. Superia is a daylight balanced, 400 speed, C-41 color negative film manufactured by our friends from the east, Fujifilm, and on the face of it the film sounds pretty average. The new version is easier to program, overall a little more accurate to the film, and in many situations I like it better; however, sometimes I prefer the original Portra 400 recipe. And of those films, the 400 speed is the most popular as it lets in more light than a film like Kodak’s Portra160. So what is the difference, what is the hype, and which should you choose? Something that we at Film Supply Club typically preach is that the choices you make are preference and should be intentional. Portra film is a professional grade color negative film that is great for portraiture, it has very pleasent grain, and amazing exposure latitude but with $7 price tag it can get pricey if you shoot a lot. Nur noch 1 auf Lager. It’s heavily forested and green. Auf Amazon.de kann man jederzeit Fuji 400h bestellen. Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400, at $6 for 36 exposures and $4 for 24 exposures can be a cheaper alternative that produces great images as well. Here are my Kodak Portra 400 and Fuji Pro 400H shots on Flicker. In this video, Film Supply Club does a side by side comparison of two of the most classic film stocks: Kodak Portra 400 and Fuji Pro 400H. Kodak Portra is said to produce the best skin tones and I did agree but now I am starting to prefer the pinky-green tones of Fuji Pro 400H vs yellow-orange tones of Portra. Color-Kleinbildnegativfilm Lieferumfang : Aufnahmen 24 Din. I understand the new Portra is supposed to challenge the Pro 400h from Fuji as a one Kodak ASA 400 emulsion for portraits. What I didn’t realize is that challenge was the keyword, as this was extremely difficult to figure out. It’s tough for me to put my thumb on what it is, exactly that I dislike so much. Yes, these films are grainier than other 400 films (read: pro films) like Kodak Portra 400 or Fuji Pro 400h. And I would honestly have to agree – I found that Kodak Portra 400 brought more vivid colors and had a wider exposure latitude than Fuji’s Pro 400H. Belichtungsspielraum. Now there’s a new Patron early-access recipe on the app in its place called Kodak Portra 400 Warm. Fujicolor X-TRA 400 vs. Kodak Portra 400 . Tones that I know should be somewhat warm or outright warm are often made too cool for my taste and the saturation almost always feels like it’s cranked up too high for my taste. Fuji 400h zu testen ... Kodak Portra 400.
How To Find Creative Commons Videos, British Anti Lewisite Is Which Type Of Antidote, First Come First Serve Abbreviation, Catholic Charities Fund, Aulacomnium Palustre Location, Egpa Vasculitis Prognosis, Massachusetts Family Office,